Mar 28, 2019 Apple offers several MacBook models ranging from the cheaper (and recently updated) MacBook Air to the shiny new MacBook Pro (MBP) with a touch bar. Each MacBook line serves a purpose, but if you’re looking for a capable gaming machine, the 15-inch MacBook Pro is the top choice. The Apple iMac Pro is a beautiful ode to creative professionals, combining remarkable computing power with the same brilliant 5k display and sleek design of the iMac. MSRP $4,999.00 $4,525.00 at. May 27, 2019 The 2019 MacBook Pro definitely has a leg up when it comes to its 8 core processor, however, the graphics options from the 2018 model were pretty much unchanged. So, can you game on the Mac.
By AppleInsider Staff
Thursday, January 18, 2018, 06:35 pm PT (09:35 pm ET)
Apple's announcement of the iMac Pro renewed the company's commitment to support professionals with high-end hardware that can handle difficult tasks. The last time Apple released a pro desktop was in late 2013 with the cylindrical Mac Pro, which featured a daring redesign and a very compact footprint.
Since the launch of the latest Mac Pro, however, Apple hasn't made any changes or upgrades to the system, leaving many professionals that purchased it waiting for an update with more powerful hardware. In the spring of 2017, Phil Schiller and Craig Federighi met with the press and admitted that the lack of Mac Pro updates was due to thermal limitations, and that an all new modular Mac Pro with a standalone Pro display is set to debut in 2018, likely near the end of the year.
Mac For Gaming
Apple also showed off the iMac Pro, which is now available to purchase, and which features powerful high-end hardware combined with a beautiful 5K display. This may leave Mac Pro owners wondering if they should wait for a modular Mac Pro or upgrade to the iMac Pro. The all-in-one should have better performance than their current Mac Pro and will most likely be a better value than a future Mac Pro since it comes with a display, keyboard, and a mouse.
The Mac Pro we're using in this comparison originally retailed for over $7,000, but with the latest price drops it comes in at just $4,999. Thats the same exact price as our iMac Pro, albeit without the display or accessories.
Both computers have 8-core processors, 32GB of RAM, and 1TB of SSD storage. The Mac Pro has dual AMD D700 graphics cards, each with 6GB of memory, whereas our iMac Pro has a single AMD Vega 56 GPU with 8GB of HBM2 memory.
The specs are fairly simple, but with chips that are four years newer, how much faster is the iMac Pro?
Kicking off the tests, we're looking at SSD performance. The iMac Pro's NVME SSDs are about twice as fast, with write speeds reaching 3000MB/s.
Next we used Geekbench 4, a cross platform benchmark that tests a variety of CPU tasks. In the Multi-Core test, our iMac Pro comes in with a respectable 30 percent higher score.
Looking at single cores speeds, the iMac Pro leads by about 35 percent.
Testing OpenCL graphics performance, the Vega 56 is about 65 percent faster, but Geekbench is only testing one of the two D700 graphics cards. This means if we double the score, the Mac Pro has more raw graphics power, but we'll wait and see if our real world programs can effectively utilize both graphics cards to make a real world difference.
Taking another look at graphics, but this time with Unigine Heaven (a gaming performance benchmark that will max out the graphics card), we found it could only use one graphics card yet again, averaging 29 frames per second. By comparison, the iMac Pro averaged almost 73 frames per second. As far as gaming goes, dual graphics cards typically don't perform at twice the level of a single unit.
Let's finish off the benchmarks with Cinebench R15, a 3D animation benchmark that will push the 8-core processors to their limits. Our iMac Pro scored 1682, over 50 percent higher raw CPU power when we're maxing them out.
In conclusion, we saw some good performance gains with the new iMac Pro, especially when pushing the machines to their limits. In part two of our series, well take a look at photo editing performance and talk about upgradability, so be sure to subscribe to our YouTube channel for details.
'Tapered Edge' Aluminum iMac Q&A
Revision Published March 28, 2019
All Mac Q&As >>'Tapered Edge' Aluminum iMac Q&A (Home)
To be notified of new Q&As, sign up for EveryMac.com's bimonthly email list.
If you find this page useful, please Bookmark & Share it. Thank you.
How fast are the 'Mid-2017' iMac models compared to one another? How fast are they compared to the 'Late 2015' models replaced and the Mac Pro?
Please note that most of the 'Mid-2017' iMac models have been discontinued. However, the entry-level option -- the iMac 'Core i5' 2.3 21.5-Inch (Mid-2017) -- still is sold as new alongside newer '2019' iMac systems. This Q&A is up-to-date and can be useful for anyone considering one of the 'Mid-2017' iMac models whether new or used.
In the corporate press release for the 'Mid-2017' iMac, Apple focuses on disk speed, stating that the 'SSD storage options are now up to 50 percent faster' than their predecessors.
In other promo copy, Apple claims that graphics performance is substantially improved with between 1.4x and 3.0x better performance than the models replaced in video editing, gaming, and 3D graphics-related tasks.
Photo Credit: Apple, Inc. (Mid-2017 iMac Models)
The 'Mid-2017' iMac series packs a new, more advanced processor and architecture as well as graphics processors, so it would be a reasonable assumption that the performance gains compared to their predecessors would be significant. Just how significant requires benchmarks and real-world testing, though.
General Performance Overview
For a general overview of overall performance between the 'Mid-2017' iMac models and earlier Mac desktops and notebooks alike, EveryMac.com's own Ultimate Mac Comparison makes it quick to compare side-by-side 32-bit and 64-bit Geekbench benchmark averages with all other G3 and later Macs for thousands of possible performance comparisons.
For example, for the 'Mid-2017' iMac models compared to one another, the Geekbench 4.0 benchmark shows that the cheapest 21.5-Inch iMac 4K model -- the iMac 'Core i5' 3.0 21.5-Inch (4K, Mid-2017) -- is effectively the same speed single core tasks but an impressive 39% faster in multicore tasks than the entry-level iMac 'Core i5' 2.3 21.5-Inch (Mid-2017).
In turn, the entry-level 27-Inch 5K model -- the iMac 'Core i5' 3.4 27-Inch (5K, Mid-2017) is 5% faster in single core tasks and 6% faster in multicore tasks than the iMac 'Core i5' 3.0 21.5-Inch (4K, Mid-2017).
For those interested in maximum performance from the 'Mid-2017' iMac series, Geekbench 4.0 shows that the custom configured iMac 'Core i7' 4.2 27-Inch (5K, Mid-2017), which is a US$200 processor upgrade for the standard high-end iMac 'Core i5' 3.8 27-Inch (5K, Mid-2017), is 9% faster in single core tasks and 26% faster in multicore tasks. Because it costs 9% more, but increases performance by the same amount in single core tasks and much more in multicore tasks, this custom processor upgrade represents a particularly good value.
'Late 2015' iMac vs. 'Mid-2017' iMac Performance
The Geekbench 4.0 benchmark mostly shows that the 'Mid-2017' iMac models are faster across the board compared to the 'Late 2015' models replaced. Because eight models have replaced seven, EveryMac.com has opted to compare standard models to one another and BTO/CTO configurations to one another:
| Late 2015 iMac | Mid-2017 iMac | Percent Faster |
| 'Core i5' 1.6 21.5' 'Core i5' 2.8 21.5' | 'Core i5' 2.3 21.5' | 41%-62% -21%-12%* |
| 'Core i5' 3.1 21.5' 4K | 5%-7% 10%-11% | |
| 'Core i7' 3.3 21.5' 4K | 'Core i7' 3.6 21.5' 4K | 17%-20% |
| 'Core i5' 3.2 27' 5K | 'Core i5' 3.4 27' 5K | 8%-14% |
| 'Core i5' 3.3 27' 5K | 8%-12% 10%-15% | |
| 'Core i7' 4.0 27' 5K | 'Core i7' 4.2 27' 5K | 6%-10% |
*The entry-level iMac 'Core i5' 2.3 21.5' (Mid-2017) only has two cores whereas the higher-end iMac non-4K 'Late 2015' model -- the iMac 'Core i5' 2.8 21.5' (Late 2015) -- has four cores. Consequently, the 'Mid-2017' model is 12% faster in single core tasks, because of its faster architecture, but 21% slower in multicore tasks, because it has half the number of cores of its predecessor.
Apple Mac Pro Pc
With the potential exception of the change to the entry-level non-4K iMac models between lines, Geekbench 4.0 shows that the performance increase between these models and their predecessors is significant.
'Mid-2017' iMac vs. 'Late 2013' Mac Pro Performance
The Geekbench 4.0 benchmark soundly demonstrates the performance difference in single core and multicore tasks between the high-end 27-Inch 'Mid-2017' iMac and the much older 'Late 2013' Mac Pro models:
| Mid-2017 iMac | Late 2013 Mac Pro | Single Core | Multicore |
| 'Core i5' 3.4 27' 5K | 'Quad Core' 3.7 | +26% | +8% |
| 'Core i5' 3.5 27' 5K | 'Six Core' 3.5 | +33% | -15% |
| 'Core i5' 3.8 27' 5K | 'Eight Core' 3.0 | +35% | -32% |
| 'Core i7' 4.2 27' 5K | 'Twelve Core' 2.7 | +67% | -25% |
Geekbench 4.0 benchmarks show that the entry-level 'Mid-2017' iMac -- the iMac 'Core i5' 3.4 27-Inch (5K, Mid-2017) -- is faster than the now discontinued Mac Pro 'Quad Core' 3.7 (Late 2013) in single core and multicore tasks alike.
However, the remainder of the 'Mid-2017' iMac models compared to the much older Mac Pro models are faster in single core tasks, but still notably slower in multicore ones.
Other Benchmarks & Real-World Test Results
Geekbench benchmarks provide a good overview of overall performance, but additional benchmarks and real-world tests also can be useful, particularly given Apple's emphasis on disk-related and graphics tasks.
PCMag reviewed both the 21.5-Inch and 27-Inch models and for graphics performance, specifically, the publication reported:
The [iMac 'Core i5' 3.4 21.5-Inch (4K, Mid-2017)] showed respectable scores on our 3D gaming tests. It returned playable frame rates (above 30 fps) on the Heaven (45 fps) and Valley (64 fps) tests at medium-quality settings. When we ran the same tests at ultra quality in its native 4K resolution, the results were much too slow for smooth animation. That said, the 2017 iMac is measurably better at 3D tasks than systems with integrated graphics, like the 2015 iMac 21.5-inch [model]...
The [iMac 'Core i5' 3.4 27-Inch (5K, Mid-2017) with its] AMD Radeon Pro 570 with 4 GB of VRAM is an increase over the 2015 model's 2 GB Radeon R9 M290. Animation and rendering software will be faster on this version thanks to the upgrade, which will benefit creative professionals. As for gaming, the 2017 iMac was able to average over 30 frames per second on the Heaven and Valley tests at ultra-quality settings and HD resolution, though the 5K native resolution is, of course, a bridge too far for the hardware.
BareFeats hit the top-of-the-line custom configured 'Mid-2017' iMac -- the iMac 'Core i7' 4.2 27-Inch (5K, Mid-2017) -- as well as the Mac Pro 'Eight Core' 3.0 (Late 2013) and an even older Mac Pro (2010/Westmere) model upgraded with dual 'Six Core' 3.33 GHz processors with a number of professional applications like Final Cut Pro X, Premier Pro, After Effects, and more.
The site concluded:
Analyzing your pro application's performance can be frustrating. Some functions are CPU intensive. Some are GPU intensive. Some are a mixture of both. In some cases the 2017 iMac 5K 4-core acquitted itself very well compared to the 12-core Mac Pro tower and 8-core Mac Pro cylinder. At other times, it was left in the dust.
Finally, MacPerformanceGuide compared the 'Mid-2017' 5K iMac to the 'Late 2015' 5K iMac as well as the 'Late 2013' Mac Pro.
Comparing the 2015 and 2017 iMac models with an Apple 1 TB SSD, the site found that the 'Mid-2017' iMac provided 'outstanding' sustained disk performance using large files -- '40% faster for reads and 38% faster for writes' -- but its performance actually was 'substantially slower for everyday tasks that involve intensive I/O with smaller reads' when transfer sizes are less than 1 MB.
For Photoshop, in a series of its own benchmark tests, the site discovered:
The 2017 iMac 5K offers a substantial speed boost over its 2015 predecessor and boots the fastest possible Mac Pro into 2nd place.
However, it also is worth noting that by upgrading the processor in the Mac Pro, it still is possible to create a Mac Pro that is faster than the much newer 'Mid-2017' iMac models, even though Photoshop does not take full advantage of multicore processors.
Performance Summary
Ultimately, the 'Mid-2017' iMac models provide a significant speed boost compared to their predecessors in overall performance, graphics performance, and disk performance. They trounce the much older Mac Pro models in many single core tasks, too.
In the US, site sponsor Adorama sells new Aluminum iMac models free of sales tax outside of NY and NJ and with free shipping for all. Site sponsor Evertek sells used Aluminum iMac models at bargain prices to individuals and ships bulk orders at wholesale prices worldwide. Finally, if you need to sell an iMac, A+ BBB-rated Cash for Your Mac will buy your older iMac with an instant quote and prompt payment.
In the UK, site sponsor Apple-Bay also has some used Aluminum iMac models, all verified and refurbished by an in-house Apple Certified Mac Technician and sold with a one-year warranty and free delivery in the mainland UK.
In Australia, site sponsor Mac City likewise has a variety of used Aluminum iMac models sold at low prices and available with a free warranty and fast shipping across Australia.
Permalink | E-mail a Friend | Bookmark & Share | Report an Error/Typo
Suggest a New Q&A | Sign Up for Bimonthly Site Update Notices
<< 'Tapered Edge' Aluminum iMac Q&A (Main) | All Mac Q&As
Apple Mac Pro Best Buy
Apple Mac Pro Gaming Benchmarks And Standards
EveryMac.com is provided 'as is' without warranty of any kind whatsoever. EveryMac.com, and the author thereof, shall not be held responsible or liable, under any circumstances, for any damages resulting from the use or inability to use the information within. For complete disclaimer and copyright information please read and understand the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy before using EveryMac.com. Use of any content or images without expressed permission is not allowed, although links to any page are welcomed and appreciated.